Notes |
- RESEARCH_NOTES:
1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels
For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf
Hunt:
Henry Hunt, Boughton Menchonse, Kent
William Hunt, Westfarlegh, Kent
Robert Hunt, Stenynge, Sussex, laborer
Simon Hunt, Suthwerk, Surrey, taloghchaundeler
William Hunt, Chiddyngston, Kent, yoman
John Hunt, Maldon, Essex, coke
John Hunt, Maldon, Essex, hakeneyman
John Hunt, Smerden, Kent, wever
Thomas Hunte, Folkeston, Folkeston, Kent, constable of Folkeston hundred
John Hunte, Wroteham, Kent, yoman
William Hunte, Oldemere, Gostrowe, Sussex, husbondman, constable of Gostrowe hundred co. Sussex
Thomas Hunte, Dalyngton, Sussex, yoman
Richard Hunte, Charteham, Kent
2. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
Hunte, Hounte, Hamon, 86 (Hundred of Westgate); Hen., 145 (Hundred of Akystane [Axton]); Jn., 137 (Hundred of Blakehethe [Blackheath]); Jn. le, 98 (Hundred of Faversham); Pet., 122 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]); Rd., 93 (Hundred of Wy [Wye]), 120 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]); Walt. le, 139 (Hundred of Bromleg [Bromley]); Wm., 83 (Hundred of Dounhamford [Downhamford]), 120 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]).
3. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
Hunte, Hounte, Hamon, 86 (Hundred of Westgate); Hen., 145 (Hundred of Akystane [Axton]); Jn., 137 (Hundred of Blakehethe [Blackheath]); Jn. le, 98 (Hundred of Faversham); Pet., 122 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]); Rd., 93 (Hundred of Wy [Wye]), 120 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]); Walt. le, 139 (Hundred of Bromleg [Bromley]); Wm., 83 (Hundred of Dounhamford [Downhamford]), 120 (Hundred of Eyhorne [Eythorne]).
|