Chris & Julie Petersen's Genealogy

Dorothy Mills

Female Bef 1677 -


Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Dorothy Mills 
    Born Bef 1677  of Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Female 
    Person ID I725  Petersen-de Lanskoy
    Last Modified 27 May 2021 

    Family William Austen,   c. 26/26 Mar 1675/6, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Married 13 Jan 1696  Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Children 
     1. Mary Austen,   b. 1 Mar 1696, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     2. John Austen,   b. 17 Feb 1698, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     3. Ambrose Austen,   b. 17/17 Feb 1698/9, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 11 Jun 1737, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 38 years)
     4. Elizabeth Austen,   b. 24 May 1701, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     5. Ann Austen,   b. 3/03 Feb 1702/3, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     6. Lydia Austen,   b. 8 Apr 1705, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     7. William Austen,   b. 24 Aug 1708, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     8. Sarah Austen,   c. 11 Mar 1710, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     9. Dorothy Austen,   c. 12 Apr 1713, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     10. Thomas Austen,   c. 8 Jan 1715, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     11. Eleanor Austen,   c. 20 Sep 1719, Brenchley, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
    Last Modified 28 May 2021 
    Family ID F268  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  • Notes 
    • RESEARCH_NOTES:
      1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels
      For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf
      No one listed with the following surnames (or variations thereof): Acock/Alcock, Barret, Chepfield, Dancy, Dennet, Gateland, Hadwin, Hales, Herbert, Hopper, James, Kitney, Marden, Mills, Morskin, Shelly, Sisley, Straine, Upton, and Vande Wall.

      2. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
      No mentions were found for family surnames Acock/Alcock, Barret, Chepfield, Dancy, Dennett, Eagles, Gateland, Hadwin, Hales, Mills, Morskin, Shelley, Sisley, Strain, Vande Wall, Worme.

      3. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
      No mentions were found for family surnames Acock/Alcock, Barret, Chepfield, Dancy, Dennett, Eagles, Gateland, Hadwin, Hales, Mills, Morskin, Shelley, Sisley, Strain, Vande Wall, Worme.