Chris & Julie Petersen's Genealogy

John Penny

Male Bef 1618 -

Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name John Penny
    Birth Bef 1618  of Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Gender Male
    Person ID I3871  Petersen-de Lanskoy
    Last Modified 21 Jun 2026

    Family Mary Herbert,   b. Bef 1620, of Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
    Marriage 13 Jan 1639  Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Children 
     1. Frances Penny,   c. 16 Oct 1640, St. Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     2. George Penny,   c. 16 Oct 1640, St. Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     3. Sara Penny,   b. Abt 1643, of Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     4. Penny Penny,   c. 30 Apr 1645, St. Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     5. John Penny,   c. 15 Jul 1647, St. Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     6. Henry Penny,   c. 5 Dec 1651, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
     7. Thomas Penny,   c. 30 Apr 1654, St. Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, England Find all individuals with events at this location
    Family ID F1184  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
    Last Modified 30 Jun 2026

  • Notes 
    • RESEARCH_NOTES:
      1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels
      For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf
      Penny:
      Richard Peny, Holyngbourne, Kent, laborer
      William Peny, Borden, Kent

      2. Possibly another child for John may be a Sara Penny who married in 1664 and may have been born in the 5 year gap between 1640 and 1645.
      "England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NLCH-K9K : accessed 10 February 2016), George Errington and Sara Penny, 13 Aug 1668; citing Saint Nicholas,Rochester,Kent, England, reference; FHL microfilm 992,530.

      3. In the Saint Nicholas, Rochester, Kent, christening records, the only other Penny entries found are for an Edward Penny and his wife Helena/Eleanor having children beginning in the late 1600s.

      4. "Archaeologia Cantiana" - Vol. 30 (1914): "The Poll Tax in Rochester, September 1660," by A. A. Arnold <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/Vol.030%20-%201914/030-01.pdf> accessed 10 Feb 2016, page 20:
      "John Penny & his wife" living in Rochester's South Borough on September 25, 1660, when the poll tax was drawn up. John and his wife taxed 3s. 6d. Also separately listed is Henry Penny taxed 1s. This could be either a brother or father to John considering the proximity.
      Another tax record is the 1664 Hearth Tax for Rochester <http://www.hearthtax.org.uk/communities/kent/kent_1664L_transcript.pdf> accessed 10 Feb 2016 (page 157) for John Penny, living in South Borough, who had a house with 6 hearths. (He had money.) Apparently Henry is not listed therein.

      5. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
      Peny, Jn., 80 (Hundred of Bleengate [Bleangate]), 83 (Hundred of Dounhamford [Downhamford]), 89 (Hundred of Beawesberghe [Bewsborough]); Laur., 84 (Hundred of Dounhamford [Downhamford]); Rd., 113 (Hundred of Hoo); Steph., 77 (Hundred of Cornylo [Cornilo]); Thos., 83 (Hundred of Dounhamford [Downhamford]).