Mabell Lambe

Bef 1552 -

• Name	Mabell Lambe
  Birth	Bef 1552	of Boxley, Kent, England
  Gender	Female
  Person ID	I1065	Petersen-de Lanskoy
  Last Modified	21 Jun 2026

  
  

  Family	Richard Tylden,   b. Bef 1550, of Boxley, Kent, England
  Marriage	Bef 1571	of Boxley, Kent, England
  Children	1. Joisa Tylden,   b. Bef 1571, of Boxley, Kent, England bur. 17 Aug 1638, Stockbury, Kent, England (Age ~ 67 years)   2. John Tylden,   c. 19 Jul 1573, Boxley, Kent, England d. Bef 1580, of Brenchley, Kent, England (Age ~ 6 years)   3. Richard Tylden,   c. 12 Jul 1575, Boxley, Kent, England bur. 18 Jul 1575, Boxley, Kent, England (Age ~ 0 years)   4. Richard Tylden,   c. 10 Nov 1578, Boxley, Kent, England   5. John Tylden,   c. 21 Dec 1580, Brenchley, Kent, England   6. William Tylden,   c. 14 Feb 1584, Boxley, Kent, England d. Aft 1627, , Kent, England (Age ~ 44 years)
  Family ID	F653	Group Sheet  |  Family Chart
  Last Modified	30 Jun 2026

  
  

• Notes

  RESEARCH_NOTES: 1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf Lambe: John Lamb John Lambe, Holyngbourne, Kent, husbondman John Lambe, Dalyngton, Sussex, yoman John Lambe 2. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed: Lamb, Jn., 143 (2) (Hundred of Codesheath [Codsheath]), 157 (Hundred of Folkestane [Folkestone]), 159 (Cantuaria [Canterbury]: Tenth).