Chris & Julie Petersen's Genealogy
Mabell Lambe
Bef 1552 --
Name Mabell Lambe Born Bef 1552 of Boxley, Kent, England Gender Female Person ID I1065 Petersen-de Lanskoy Last Modified 27 May 2021
Family Richard Tylden, b. Bef 1550, of Boxley, Kent, England Married Bef 1571 of Boxley, Kent, England Children 1. Joisa Tylden, b. Bef 1571, of Boxley, Kent, England , bur. 17 Aug 1638, Stockbury, Kent, England (Age ~ 67 years) 2. John Tylden, c. 19 Jul 1573, Boxley, Kent, England , d. Bef 1580, of Brenchley, Kent, England (Age ~ 6 years) 3. Richard Tylden, c. 12 Jul 1575, Boxley, Kent, England , bur. 18 Jul 1575, Boxley, Kent, England (Age ~ 0 years) 4. Richard Tylden, c. 10 Nov 1578, Boxley, Kent, England 5. John Tylden, c. 21 Dec 1580, Brenchley, Kent, England 6. William Tylden, c. 14 Feb 1584, Boxley, Kent, England , d. Aft 1627, , Kent, England (Age ~ 44 years) Last Modified 28 May 2021 Family ID F649 Group Sheet | Family Chart
-
Notes - RESEARCH_NOTES:
1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels
For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf
Lambe:
John Lamb
John Lambe, Holyngbourne, Kent, husbondman
John Lambe, Dalyngton, Sussex, yoman
John Lambe
2. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
Lamb, Jn., 143 (2) (Hundred of Codesheath [Codsheath]), 157 (Hundred of Folkestane [Folkestone]), 159 (Cantuaria [Canterbury]: Tenth).
- RESEARCH_NOTES: