Ellin Worme b. Bef 1560 of West Farleigh, Kent, England

Chris & Julie Petersen's Genealogy

Bef 1560 -

Personal Information | Notes | All | PDF

Name	Ellin Worme
Born	Bef 1560	of West Farleigh, Kent, England
Gender	Female
Person ID	I2848	Petersen-de Lanskoy
Last Modified	27 May 2021

Family William Field, b. Bef 1558, of Teston, Kent, England

Married 3 Jan 1579 West Farleigh, Kent, England

Children

	1. Henrie Field, c. 16 Oct 1580, Teston, Kent, England , bur. 23 Feb 1643, Teston, Kent, England (Age ~ 62 years)
	2. Jone Field, c. 13 Sep 1582, Teston, Kent, England
	3. Elizabeth Field, c. 14 Mar 1584, Teston, Kent, England
	4. William Field, c. 16 Jun 1588, Teston, Kent, England
	5. Tomazen Field, c. 14 Feb 1590, Teston, Kent, England
	6. Alice Field, c. 30 Nov 1600, Teston, Kent, England , bur. 12 Apr 1642, East Malling, Kent, England (Age ~ 41 years)
	7. Marie Field, c. 30 Nov 1600, Teston, Kent, England

Last Modified 28 May 2021

Family ID F1534 Group Sheet | Family Chart

Notes

RESEARCH_NOTES:
1. Jack Cade's Rebellion of 1450: A Database of Names of those Receiving Pardons, taken from Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VI 5 (1909) pp. 338-374 accessed from https://familysearch.org. This spreadsheet of about 3449 persons was created by Merton Historical Society in September 2014, and is accessible at http://www.mertonhistoricalsociety.org.uk/index.php?cat=morden&sec=!rebels
For more detail on this listing and the event see http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/ArchCant/007%20-%201868/007-03.pdf
Worme:
Robert Worme, Strode, Kent, harbour

2. The following extraction was made from the "Index to the Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by H.A. Hanley, B.A. and C.W. Chalklin, M.A., B. Litt <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/7/313.htm> accessed 11 Feb 2016. From this index, the actual entries are found in "The Kent Lay Subsidy Roll of 1334/5," by the same authors <http://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/Research/Pub/KRV/18/3/058-172.htm> accessed 12 Feb 2016. The second document more fully explains the history of this Lay Subsity. This was a tax assessed on householders; however, it probably only represents about 50% of the householders since the poorer families were not assessed:
No mentions were found for family surnames Acock/Alcock, Barret, Chepfield, Dancy, Dennett, Eagles, Gateland, Hadwin, Hales, Mills, Morskin, Shelley, Sisley, Strain, Vande Wall, Worme.